Wallet source-of-funds evidence

Build the chain evidence before drawing conclusions.

ChainDossier organizes public wallet history into a chronology, counterparty map, and evidence appendix for source-of-funds questions that need a fast, reviewable starting point.

Public addresses only · No wallet connection · Informational research, not professional advice

The deliverable

Observations, labels, and interpretation stay separate.

A wallet address is not a verified identity. The dossier preserves that distinction while documenting the transaction history and public context that can be established from open sources.

01 / TIMELINE

Activity chronology

Summarize first and latest activity, material periods, concentrated flows, and relevant contract interactions.

02 / SOURCES

Citable evidence

Keep explorer links, UTC timestamps, transaction hashes, and label provenance attached to the observations.

03 / LIMITS

Explicit uncertainty

Document what public data cannot establish, including identity, economic purpose, and off-chain source context.

Questions

Scope before purchase.

Does the report prove source of funds?

No. It documents public-chain evidence and open questions; off-chain proof and professional judgment remain necessary.

Will you identify the wallet owner?

No. An address is not treated as a verified person or legal entity.

What information is required?

A public EVM address, the network, and optional context about the decision you are reviewing.

Is the result automated?

The free snapshot is automated. The paid dossier is manually reviewed before delivery.

Start with one public wallet.

A manually reviewed evidence brief for €249, targeted within 24 hours.

Book the €49 QuickCheck
Important: ChainDossier analyzes public blockchain and open-source information. It does not identify beneficial ownership, certify funds as clean, guarantee safety, or provide legal, regulatory, tax, accounting, AML, sanctions, investment, or financial advice.